Can Silence Signal Acceptance In Contract Law?

In general, silence does not signal acceptance in contract law. Acceptance typically requires some form of clear and affirmative action, such as verbal or written agreement, to create a binding contract. However, there are exceptions where silence can be considered acceptance, depending on the circumstances and prior relationship between the parties.

General Rule: Silence is Not Acceptance

In most cases, silence alone does not constitute acceptance of an offer. This is based on the principle that a party should not be bound to a contract without their clear and affirmative consent. For example, if one party makes an offer and the other party does not respond, the offeror cannot assume the offer has been accepted simply because there was no rejection.

Exceptions Where Silence May Constitute Acceptance

1. Previous Dealings or Course of Conduct:
   • If the parties have a history of doing business in which silence has been treated as acceptance, silence may be considered an indication of agreement. For instance, if in previous transactions one party regularly accepts offers by not responding, that pattern of behavior may establish that silence is an acceptable form of acceptance between them.
   • Example: A supplier and a buyer have had a long-standing agreement where the buyer’s failure to object to the supplier’s offers has been treated as acceptance. In such cases, silence could be viewed as consent.
2. Benefit of Services:
   • If one party knowingly receives and accepts the benefits of services or goods offered, and had an opportunity to reject them but chose to remain silent, their silence may imply acceptance of the contract.
   • Example: A landscaper performs services for a homeowner. If the homeowner is aware of the work and does not object, silence and the enjoyment of those services could be treated as acceptance of the landscaper’s offer, obligating payment.
3. Solicited Offers:
   • If a person solicits an offer and remains silent after receiving it, their silence may indicate acceptance, especially if rejecting the offer would be contrary to good faith or previous communication.
   • Example: If a company requests a service proposal and remains silent after receiving it, knowing the service will proceed without objection, this silence could be seen as acceptance.
4. Contractual Terms Requiring Rejection:
   • In some cases, contracts may specify that silence will be considered acceptance unless the offeree expressly rejects the offer. However, this needs to be agreed upon in advance and clearly stated in the contract.
   • Example: An insurance renewal contract might specify that failure to respond to a renewal offer will result in automatic acceptance of the new terms.
5. Implied Contracts:
   • In situations where the actions of the parties imply mutual agreement without explicit communication, a contract may be formed even if no verbal or written acceptance occurs. This is particularly common in scenarios where conduct or performance demonstrates that both parties agree to the terms.

Conclusion

While silence is generally not considered acceptance in contract law, exceptions exist based on past dealings, the acceptance of benefits, or specific contractual terms. If one party wants to rely on silence as a form of acceptance, the circumstances must clearly support such an interpretation, and there must typically be some established relationship or implied consent between the parties.

Real Estate Expert Witness Services by Craig Cherney, Esc.

Craig Cherney is a trusted client advisor and a sought after real estate expert witness who is hired by the nation’s top Real Estate Litigation Attorneys to help resolve their litigated real property matters.  Craig has appeared as a testifying expert witness before judges and juries in California, Arizona, Nevada and other jurisdictions across the country. Craig Cherney, Esq.